"We
can choose between the future and the past"
2004 Democratic National Convention Speech
By Ron Regan
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
A few of you may be surprised to see someone with my last
name showing up to speak at a Democratic convention. Let
me assure you, I am not here to make a political speech,
and the topic at hand should not-must not-have anything to
do with partisanship.
I am here tonight to talk about the issue of research into
what may be the greatest medical breakthrough in our or in
any lifetime: the use of embryonic stem cells-cells created
using the material of our own bodies-to cure a wide range
of fatal and debilitating illnesses: Parkinson's disease,
multiple sclerosis, diabetes, lymphoma, spinal cord injuries,
and much more. Millions are afflicted. Every year, every
day, tragedy is visited upon families across the country,
around the world.
Now, we may be able to put an end to this suffering. We
only need to try. Some of you already know what I'm talking
about when I say "embryonic stem cell research." Others of
you are probably thinking, hmm, that's quite a mouthful,
what is this all about?
Let me try and paint as simple a picture as I can while
still doing justice to the incredible science involved. Let's
say that ten or so years from now you are diagnosed with
Parkinson's disease. There is currently no cure and drug
therapy, with its attendant side-effects, can only temporarily
relieve the symptoms.
Now, imagine going to a doctor who, instead of prescribing
drugs, takes a few skin cells from your arm. The nucleus
of one of your cells is placed into a donor egg whose own
nucleus has been removed. A bit of chemical or electrical
stimulation will encourage your cell's nucleus to begin dividing,
creating new cells which will then be placed into a tissue
culture. Those cells will generate embryonic stem cells containing
only your DNA, thereby eliminating the risk of tissue rejection.
These stem cells are then driven to become the very neural
cells that are defective in Parkinson's patients. And finally,
those cells-with your DNA-are injected into your brain where
they will replace the faulty cells whose failure to produce
adequate dopamine led to the Parkinson's disease in the first
place.
In other words, you're cured. And another thing, these embryonic
stem cells, they could continue to replicate indefinitely
and, theoretically, can be induced to recreate virtually
any tissue in your body. How'd you like to have your own
personal biological repair kit standing by at the hospital?
Sound like magic? Welcome to the future of medicine.
By the way, no fetal tissue is involved in this process.
No fetuses are created, none destroyed. This all happens
in the laboratory at the cellular level.
Now, there are those who would stand in the way of this
remarkable future, who would deny the federal funding so
crucial to basic research. They argue that interfering with
the development of even the earliest stage embryo, even one
that will never be implanted in a womb and will never develop
into an actual fetus, is tantamount to murder. A few of these
folks, needless to say, are just grinding a political axe
and they should be ashamed of themselves. But many are well-meaning
and sincere. Their belief is just that, an article of faith,
and they are entitled to it.
But it does not follow that the theology of a few should
be allowed to forestall the health and well-being of the
many. And how can we affirm life if we abandon those whose
own lives are so desperately at risk?
It is a hallmark of human intelligence that we are able
to make distinctions. Yes, these cells could theoretically
have the potential, under very different circumstances, to
develop into human beings-that potential is where their magic
lies. But they are not, in and of themselves, human beings.
They have no fingers and toes, no brain or spinal cord. They
have no thoughts, no fears. They feel no pain. Surely we
can distinguish between these undifferentiated cells multiplying
in a tissue culture and a living, breathing person-a parent,
a spouse, a child.
I know a child-well, she must be 13 now-I'd better call
her a young woman. She has fingers and toes. She has a mind.
She has memories. She has hopes. And she has juvenile diabetes.
Like so many kids with this disease, she has adjusted amazingly
well. The insulin pump she wears-she's decorated hers with
rhinestones. She can insert her own catheter needle. She
has learned to sleep through the blood drawings in the wee
hours of the morning. She's very brave. She is also quite
bright and understands full well the progress of her disease
and what that might ultimately mean: blindness, amputation,
diabetic coma. Every day, she fights to have a future.
What excuse will we offer this young woman should we fail
her now? What might we tell her children? Or the millions
of others who suffer? That when given an opportunity to help,
we turned away? That facing political opposition, we lost
our nerve? That even though we knew better, we did nothing?
And, should we fail, how will we feel if, a few years from
now, a more enlightened generation should fulfill the promise
of embryonic stem cell therapy? Imagine what they would say
of us who lacked the will.
No, we owe this young woman and all those who suffer-we
owe ourselves-better than that. We are better than that.
A wiser people, a finer nation. And for all of us in this
fight, let me say: we will prevail.
The tide of history is with us. Like all generations who
have come before ours, we are motivated by a thirst for knowledge
and compelled to see others in need as fellow angels on an
often difficult path, deserving of our compassion.
In a few months, we will face a choice. Yes, between two
candidates and two parties, but more than that. We have a
chance to take a giant stride forward for the good of all
humanity. We can choose between the future and the past,
between reason and ignorance, between true compassion and
mere ideology. This is our moment, and we must not falter.
Whatever else you do come November 2nd, I urge you, please,
cast a vote for embryonic stem cell research. Thank you for
your time.
(Return
to top of page) |